or the benefits of using the language of academia in daily life, as well as other not-so-important news of little note and short remembrance.
[from Spencer's The Practice of Harmony] "...[it] may also be viewed as consisting of two tetrachords separated by two half steps. The upper tetrachord, however, differs for each variant...all three variants have the same lower tetrachord: 2-1-2...[however, in one variant the upper tetrachord] is the retrograde of the major tetrachord...[In another variant the upper tetrachord] is palindromic...
Without the aid of the accompanying diagrams, how much can you actually make of this ponderous assemblage of fustian locution?
This entire paragraph is devoted to explaining the minor scale...the natural and harmonic minors scales, to be precise. Now, I know that there are far better examples available for your perusal, but this was an example I ran across while reading yesterday! My first day of class! Granted, it will probably not be assigned until tomorrow, but still, is there really a necessity for such complex explanations of such simple topics?
In other news, I took the first biology quiz today. I looked over my notes (even though it was an open book test), since the professor said that that would probably be a good idea. Well...I finished the first page of the quiz on BlackBoard (6 questions). The professor had implied that we would need to work quickly in order to finish in the time provided. So I was working quickly.
I clicked "next." BlackBoard displayed a screen saying "Congratulations, Test Complete. Click Here to view results."
Wow, that was easy. Elapsed time: 1:05 minutes out of 30 minutes alloted. Points: 15/15. Great. And I had stressed about whether I should take it today or wait until I had rereviewed the material. Maybe this class won't be as hard as I thought!
I have two HUGE classes - GNED (an extremely basic required worldview course) of about 250+ at 7:40 MWF and BIOL 101 at 8:50 TH with about 350+ students. Massive classes, but both just about impossible to fail if you show up. In fact, 10% of your Biology grade is based on being present at the lectures, and if you get more than 570 out of the 660 points possible on the course, you get an A.
Contrast that with MUSC 107. It's the complement to MUSC 105, which is basic music theory (for which I have the Spencer book quoted above). MUSC 107 is the reason 50% of music majors switch to something else. Basically, it is sight singing and rhythm tapping in front of the whole class (about 30). You start each day with a grade of 100%. For each measure in which you make a mistake, you lose four points. You get a grade at the end of each lecture. But they stop dropping points once you get to 60% (so generous!) The professor said that a score in the lower 80% range was considered very good for the first day of classes. You must have an average of at least 70% accuracy in order to pass the class. Rhythm shouldn't be to much of a problem until I get to compound meters with triplet vs duplet patterns. And as long as I can keep my pitches straight, the sight singing should be horrible. But I have to do it in front of 30 people, some of whom I'll be seeing EVERY DAY between band and music classes. So I'm sure it won't be the most enjoyable part of my musical training here at LU. The good thing is that I know generally what I'll be singing (actually, I should be able to figure it out exactly once I figure where my assigned seat is).
So that's the only really tough class I have this semester - and everyone who's mentioned it says it's misery. But as long as I pass I should be able to keep my GPA up high enough on the "fluff" courses to do OK.
So that's my rant for today. I'm actually enjoying myself quite a bit - and Dr. Kerr was right, I do feel like I have a lot of free time!
Eat Pork